Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Mapping the Country of RegionsThe Chorographic Commission of Nineteenth-Century Colombia$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Nancy P. Appelbaum

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9781469627441

Published to North Carolina Scholarship Online: January 2017

DOI: 10.5149/northcarolina/9781469627441.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.northcarolina.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of North Carolina Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CSO for personal use (for details see http://www.northcarolina.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 19 November 2017

A Seat among the Savants

A Seat among the Savants

Controversies after Codazzi

Chapter:
(p.184) 8 A Seat among the Savants
Source:
Mapping the Country of Regions
Author(s):

Nancy P. Appelbaum

Publisher:
University of North Carolina Press
DOI:10.5149/northcarolina/9781469627441.003.0009

The eighth chapter examines controversies that swirled around the commission’s final publications. In his final months, Codazzi fretted that the commission’s work would languish in obscurity, gathering dust in the archive. His worries were justified; most of the illustrations were indeed locked away for a century. In an effort to avoid this fate, he presented a detailed plan for deluxe and illustrated publications of detailed texts and maps, with which he intended to take his seat among the world’s savants and represent New Granada at the table of civilized nations. After his death in 1859, his cartography and reports were simplified, redacted, and published without illustrations, amidst a bitter feud that underscored the political significance of science and history. Tensions embedded in the commission erupted in the context of violent conflicts among competing Liberal factions over control of the state. Tomás Cipriano de Mosquera attacked the redactor of the commission’s work, Felipe Pérez, along with Codazzi’s own methods and findings. Controversies over the commission would become increasingly partisan later in the nineteenth century, as Liberals and Conservatives staked out competing interpretations of history, prehistory, and geography that reflected differing ideologies.

Keywords:   Agustín Codazzi, Conservatives, Liberals, Tomás Cipriano de Mosquera, Felipe Pérez, Science

North Carolina Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .