This chapter situates the Historical Court within legal discourse and performance in order to assess both its radical potential and its conservative undercurrents. Legal performance allowed the petitioners to make a claim for Nisqually sovereignty, but the unofficial nature of the court also worked against an expansion of rights through which sovereignty could be exercised.
North Carolina Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.