Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
An Agrarian RepublicFarming, Antislavery Politics, and Nature Parks in the Civil War Era$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Adam Wesley Dean

Print publication date: 2015

Print ISBN-13: 9781469619910

Published to North Carolina Scholarship Online: January 2016

DOI: 10.5149/northcarolina/9781469619910.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.northcarolina.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of North Carolina Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in NCSO for personal use.date: 17 October 2019

Land-Development Politics and the American Civil War

Land-Development Politics and the American Civil War

Chapter:
(p.71) Three Land-Development Politics and the American Civil War
Source:
An Agrarian Republic
Author(s):

Adam Wesley Dean

Publisher:
University of North Carolina Press
DOI:10.5149/northcarolina/9781469619910.003.0003

This chapter deals directly with the Civil War, exploring the secession crisis in California, wartime federal policy, and the beliefs of Union soldiers. Each of these episodes shows how Republican opposition to slavery was based, in part, on a vision of proper land use. Republican criticism of slavery’s land-use practices influenced Union support in California during 1861. According to contemporaries, California was in the process of transitioning from a rough-and-tumble frontier to a more settled agricultural society. Union loyalists argued that the state’s agricultural potential could be compromised if California sided with the South and slavery. In Congress, Republicans made similar claims that slavery destroyed the land. Only free people could build ideal farming communities. When southern Democrats left for secession, Republicans saw a golden opportunity to promote small farms and agricultural permanence in the West. Ignorant of environmental realities in the region making small farms difficult to maintain, they insisted that the West could become “civilized” and loyal if settled by yeomen. Congress passed the Homestead Act, the Pacific Railroad Act, and the Land Grant College Act. It also created the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). Viewing small farmers as a natural barrier to the extension of slavery, many Republicans pushed for these four laws as a means to keep slavery from moving westward. They feared that the conflict would end with slavery largely intact.

Keywords:   Civil War, secession crisis, Republicans, anti-slavery, Union soldiers, land use, Homestead Act, Pacific Railroad Act, Land Grant College Act, US Department of Agriculture

North Carolina Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .