(In)dispensable, Desirable, Revisable?
Combining “contextual studies” by anthropologists and “textual studies” by humanists, Chapter 5 discusses comprehensive critiques of Maududi’s understandings of the state. It focuses on critiques by “traditional” former Jamaat members: Manzur Nomani, Vahiduddin Khan, and Abul Hasan Ali Nadvi as well as critiques by five “modern” Jamaat sympathizers. The aim is not simply to show that individuals critique Maududi but to equally demonstrate how critique is undertaken. How ideas, types of knowledge, forms of authority, language capacity, motivations, the (un)sayable, notions about private and public, hair style, readings of past and future, tears, joy, and much else inform and are played out in the enterprise of critique. That is, critique is connected to a form of life. Critics of Maududi are ambivalent, however. Some agree with the spirit of Maududi’s critical enterprise, but find its relevance skewed in the future. Others differentiate universalist Maududi from nationalist Maududi, to extend the former to encompass concerns and aspirations of humanity beyond the divides of faith and ethnicity. For such critics, Maqāṣid al-sharīʿā, among others, is the medium to pursue such a universalism. Yet others continue to underline the relevance of his ideas for a state by re-interpreting him differently.
North Carolina Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.